Judicial Judgement In Islamic Judiciary: An Appraisal Of Its Distinctive Attributions And Features
Keywords:
Judicial Judgement, Judiciary, Distinctive, FeatureAbstract
One of the important features of Islamic judiciary is the judicial judgement. The judicial judgement is an avenue where the judge pronounces his judgement and its reason. The judgement and its reason will be filled by plethora of jurisprudential discussions. Hence, it is occasionally confused with fiqh and fatwa while in fact the judgement is completely a different ruling mechanism compared to both fiqh and fatwa. In fact, judicial judgement will have its attributions and characteristics. On this point, this article aims to address its distinctive attributions and features. The library research and content analysis will be conducted to accomplish that aim. At the end, the article will expose and elucidate thoroughly the concept of judicial judgement of Islamic judiciary, its ingredients and distinctive attributions.
Downloads
References
ʽAbd al-Karīm Zaydān, Niẓām al-Qaḍā’ fī al-Sharīʽah al-Islāmiyyah. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 2002.
ʽAbd al-Nāṣir Mūsā Abū al-Baṣl, Naẓariyyah al-Ḥukm al-Qaḍā’ī fī al-Sharīʽah wa al-Qānūn. Jordan: Dār al-Nafā’is, 2000.
Aḥmad bin ʽAbd al-ʽAzīz al-Malībārī, Fatḥ al-Muʽīn bi Sharḥ Qurrah al-ʽAyn. Damascus: Dar al-Faiha’, 2019.
Aḥmad bin Idrīs al-Qarāfī, al-Furūq. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah Nāshirūn, 2003.
Aḥmad bin Idrīs al-Qarāfī, al-Iḥkām fī Tamyīz al-Fatāwā ‘an al-Aḥkām wa Taṣarrufāt al-Qāḍī wa al-Imām. Beirut: Dār al-Bashā’ir al-Islāmiyyah, 1995.
Ahmad Ibrahim and Mahmud Saedon, “Judges and Lawyers Under the Shari’ah”, in Administration of Islamic Law in Malaysia, ed. Farid Sufian Shuaib et al., (Petaling Jaya: Lexis Nexis, 2010), 91.
Al-Majallah. Beirut: al-Maktabah al-Adabiyyah, 1884.
Badruddin Ibrahim, Mahmad Arifin, and Siti Zainab Abd Rashid, “The Role of Fatwa and Mufti in Contemporary Muslim Society”, Pertanika Journal of human Science and Humanities 23 (2015), 315-326.
Fatḥī al-Duraynī, al-Manāhij al-Uṣūliyyah fī al-Ijtihād bi al-Ra’yī fī al-Tashrīʽ al-Islāmī. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah, 2013.
Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyyah, Iʽlām al-Muwaqqi‘īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Ālamīn. Mecca: Dār Ibn al-Jawzī, 2002.
Manṣūr bin Yūnus al-Bahūtī, Sharaḥ Muntahā al-Irādāt Daqā’iq Ūlī al-Nuhā li Sharḥ al-Muntahā. Beirut: Mu’assasah al-Risālah Nāshirūn, 2000.
Mastura Razali and Jasni Sulong, “Amalan Penulisan Penghakiman dan Pelaksanaannya di Mahkamah Syariah Malaysia”, Jurnal Syariah 24, no. 1 (2016), 25-58.
Mohamad bin Adullah, Kehakiman Islam: Teori dan Pelaksanaan. Shah Alam: Persatuan Ulama Malaysia, 2017.
Mohamad bin Adullah, Kehakiman Islam: Teori dan Pelaksanaan. Shah Alam: Persatuan Ulama Malaysia, 2017.
Mohd Badrol Awang, “Methods of Ijtihad in Islamic Judicial Proceedings with Special Reference to the Practice of the Syariah Courts in Malaysia”, (Doctorate Thesis, International Islamic University Malaysia, 2018).
Muḥammad al-Fāsī, al-Itqān wa al-Aḥkām fi Sharḥ Tuḥfah al-Aḥkām. Cairo: Dār al-Ḥadīth, 2011.
Muḥammad bin Idrīs al-Shāfiʽī, al-Umm. Manṣurah: Dār al-Wafā’, 2001.
Muḥammad Kāmil bin Muṣṭafā, al-Fatāwā al-Kāmilah fī al-Ḥawādīth al-Ṭarablīsiyyah. t.tp: t.p., 1890.
Muḥammad Naʽīm Yāsīn, Naẓariyyah al-Dawā’ bayna al-Sharīʽah al-Islāmiyyah wa Qānūn al-Murāfāʽah al-Madaniyyah wa al-Tijāriyyah. Riyadh: Dār ‘Ālam al-Kutub, 2003.
Muḥammad Taqī al-ʽUthmānī, Uṣūl al-Iftā’ wa Adābihi. Damascus: Dār al-Qalam, 2018.
Practice Direction of No. 2 of 2014.
Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, al-Fiqh al-Islāmī wa Adillatuh. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 1985.
Wahbah al-Zuḥaylī, Uṣūl al-Fiqh al-Islāmī. Damascus: Dār al-Fikr, 2004.
Zainuddīn bin Nujaim al-Miṣrī, al-Baḥr al-Rā’iq fī Sharḥ Kanz al-Daqā’iq. Beirut: Dār al-Kutub al-ʽIlmiyyah, 1998.
